Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Stillness in the Storm : The Government MUST pay all your DEBTS! - History of your Exemption Account

Stillness in the Storm : The Government MUST pay all your DEBTS! - History of your Exemption Account: Key�knowledge�and understanding can be gained in this Post - literally a History of your Exemption Account 101. This is not a how to post, with specific documents for download and detailed procedural process. However there is so much foundational knowledge here, it would be very easy to make the leap to actually filing a UCC1 Financing Statement, and Claiming your status as the executor of your strawman or exemption account.�

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Cop admits "NOT FOR HIRE" defense IS valid when traveling! � TrentsList.org

Cop admits "NOT FOR HIRE" defense IS valid when traveling! � TrentsList.org: And United States Code backs him (the cop) up on that – “Title 18 USC 31(a)(6): Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power AND USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.” … did you catch that??? “Motor vehicle” is a CAR that is used COMMERCIALLY! I operate in the ‘private’ not in the ‘public’, therefore my activities or traveling is NON-COMMERCIAL! I don’t drive a ‘motor vehicle, I travel in my car! And I don’t have plates, I have THESE instead when traveling.

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Tina Turner formally ‘relinquishes’ U.S. citizenship

Tina Turner formally ‘relinquishes’ U.S. citizenship: This item just in via an “activity” report from the U.S. Embassy in Bern, Switzerland, headlined “Soul Legend Relinquishes U.S. Citizenship.”
“Long-time Swiss resident Tina Turner” was in the embassy Oct. 24 to sign her “Statement of Voluntary Relinquishment of U.S. Citizenship under Section 349 (a)(1) of the INA” —�the Immigration and Naturalization Act.
Turner, who turns 74 in a couple weeks, retired from th

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

U.S. banks offered deal over lawsuits: report | Reuters

U.S. banks offered deal over lawsuits: report | Reuters: (Reuters) - Big U.S. banks in talks with state prosecutors to settle claims of improper mortgage practices have been offered a deal that may limit their legal liabilities in return for a multibillion-dollar payment, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday.
The talks aim to settle allegations that banks including Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial, seized the homes of delinquent borrowers and broke state laws by employing so-called "robosigners," workers who signed off on foreclosure documents en masse without reviewing the paperwork.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Court rules organic farmers can sue conventional, GMO farmers whose pesticides 'trespass' and contaminate their fields

Court rules organic farmers can sue conventional, GMO farmers whose pesticides 'trespass' and contaminate their fields: "(NaturalNews) Purveyors of conventional and genetically-modified (GM) crops -- and the pesticides and herbicides that accompany them -- are finally getting a taste of their own legal medicine. Minnesota's Star Tribune has reported that the Minnesota Court of Appeals recently ruled that a large organic farm surrounded by chemical-laden conventional farms can seek damages for lost crops, as well as lost profits, caused by the illegal trespassing of pesticides and herbicides on its property.

Oluf and Debra Johnson's 1,500-acre organic farm in Stearns County, Minn., has repeatedly been contaminated by nearby conventional and GMO farms since the couple started it in the 1990s. A local pesticide cooperative known as Paynesville Farmers Union (PFU), which is near the farm, has been cited at least four times for violating pesticide laws, and inadvertently causing damage to the Johnson's farm."

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Legal History Blog: Law and Foreign Affairs History: A SHAFR Roundtable, part 3

Legal History Blog: Law and Foreign Affairs History: A SHAFR Roundtable, part 3: "Law, Expertise, and Ideology in U.S. Foreign Relations

Historians and legal scholars can learn much from each other when it comes to foreign affairs. One might expect this to be particularly true for United States foreign affairs. After all, law and legal culture have played an outsized role in American political and social development as observers as distinct in time and outlook as Alexis de Tocqueville and Stephen Skowronek have noted."

Sunday, March 27, 2011

GOP and “Social Issues” | Feminist Law Professors

GOP and “Social Issues” | Feminist Law Professors: "The New York Times is running a story about how “a resurgent social conservative movement is shaping the first stage of the presidential nominating contest, complicating the strategy for candidates who prefer to focus on fiscal issues over faith.” Readers of this blog already know that the focus for the GOP has never really strayed from “social issues” (check out these posts from earlier this year–here, here, and here)."

Monday, September 27, 2010

Women and Equality — Gender-Based Analysis, Law, and Economic Rights, October 22-23, 2010 |Feminist Law Professors

Women and Equality — Gender-Based Analysis, Law, and Economic Rights, October 22-23, 2010 |Feminist Law Professors: "Long before the 2008 global economic crisis occurred, women in large economies began to see the promise of equality eroding. ‘Economic crisis’ policies have done nothing to reverse that trend. For example, a decade ago, the US and Canada were ranked 3rd and 1st on the UN gender-related development index; by 2009, they had already fallen to 19th and 4th, respectively, and are ranked much lower on newer equality-specific indexes. Similar patterns can be seen in the UK and many European countries."

Monday, July 26, 2010

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News, Iraq, Iran current affairs

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News, Iraq, Iran current affairs: "More than the Koran's sanction of wife-beating, the legal grounds on which the Koran sanctions it reveals an impassable gulf between Islamic and Western law. The sovereign grants inalienable rights to every individual in Western society, of which protection from violence is foremost. Every individual stands in direct relation to the state, which wields a monopoly of violence. Islam's legal system is radically different: the father is a 'governor' or 'administrator' of the family, that is, a little sovereign within his domestic realm, with the right to employ violence to control his wife and children. That is the self-understanding of modern Islam spelled out by Muslim-American scholars - and it is incompatible with the Western concept of human rights."